<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 227 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262310</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with directions to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables for Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The deduction under Section 10A was allowed as the undertaking was found to have continued in the same form post-change in ownership. Interest under Sections 234B and 234D was deemed consequential by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 227 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262310</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with directions to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables for Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The deduction under Section 10A was allowed as the undertaking was found to have continued in the same form post-change in ownership. Interest under Sections 234B and 234D was deemed consequential by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>