<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under Section 69C for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s additions lacked substantial evidence and were based on presumptions. It was concluded that the AO failed to establish that the assessee incurred unexplained expenditure as required under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under Section 69C for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s additions lacked substantial evidence and were based on presumptions. It was concluded that the AO failed to establish that the assessee incurred unexplained expenditure as required under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>