<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 218 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessee, quashing the proceedings under Section 153C due to the improper assumption of jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper satisfaction being recorded by the AO of the person searched and the person against whom proceedings are initiated. The other arguments on the merits of the case were not considered due to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 218 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessee, quashing the proceedings under Section 153C due to the improper assumption of jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper satisfaction being recorded by the AO of the person searched and the person against whom proceedings are initiated. The other arguments on the merits of the case were not considered due to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>