<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim of exemption under Section 54 for investments made in residential houses situated outside India for the assessment year 2010-2011. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent did not restrict the exemption to properties within India. The matter was remanded back to the AO for further verification of compliance with all conditions and the actual acquisition of the house property outside India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim of exemption under Section 54 for investments made in residential houses situated outside India for the assessment year 2010-2011. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent did not restrict the exemption to properties within India. The matter was remanded back to the AO for further verification of compliance with all conditions and the actual acquisition of the house property outside India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>