https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862 The Supreme Court held that the appellant had the locus standi to file the petition as he was prejudicially affected by the Government's order. The Government's order cancelling the resolution of the Panchayat Samithi was found to be valid under Section 62 of the Act but was deemed illegal due to lack of notice. The Court ruled that the Government exceeded its authority by overriding the Panchayat Samithi's power to establish and maintain Primary Health Centres. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Panchayat Samithi's authority in locating the Primary Health Centre at Lingapalem. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862 The Supreme Court held that the appellant had the locus standi to file the petition as he was prejudicially affected by the Government's order. The Government's order cancelling the resolution of the Panchayat Samithi was found to be valid under Section 62 of the Act but was deemed illegal due to lack of notice. The Court ruled that the Government exceeded its authority by overriding the Panchayat Samithi's power to establish and maintain Primary Health Centres. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Panchayat Samithi's authority in locating the Primary Health Centre at Lingapalem. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862