https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862 A petitioner under Article 226 may establish locus standi by representing a legally recognised or trustee-like interest and by showing prejudice from the impugned action; on that basis, the writ petition was maintainable. The note also states that Government action under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act had to be tested by its true statutory character, that a review power could not be used to reopen an order falling under a different provision, and that mandatory statutory notice to affected village representatives was required before passing a prejudicial order. The later order was treated as invalid, but writ relief was refused in discretion. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862 A petitioner under Article 226 may establish locus standi by representing a legally recognised or trustee-like interest and by showing prejudice from the impugned action; on that basis, the writ petition was maintainable. The note also states that Government action under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act had to be tested by its true statutory character, that a review power could not be used to reopen an order falling under a different provision, and that mandatory statutory notice to affected village representatives was required before passing a prejudicial order. The later order was treated as invalid, but writ relief was refused in discretion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171862