https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171861 Rule 5(8)(i) of the Aligarh Muslim University Revised Leave Rules, 1969 governed employees who failed to return after leave expired, while Rule 5(8)(ii) applied to a different rejoining situation; Rule 10(c)(ii) operated only where sanctioned leave plus absence exceeded five years, so it did not apply to either employee. In the second employee's case, the show cause notice and reply satisfied the procedural requirement under Rule 5(8)(i). In the first employee's case, the absence of notice did not vitiate the action because advance warning had already been given, the employee remained absent after taking fresh foreign employment, and a further opportunity could not have changed the result. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:52:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171861 Rule 5(8)(i) of the Aligarh Muslim University Revised Leave Rules, 1969 governed employees who failed to return after leave expired, while Rule 5(8)(ii) applied to a different rejoining situation; Rule 10(c)(ii) operated only where sanctioned leave plus absence exceeded five years, so it did not apply to either employee. In the second employee's case, the show cause notice and reply satisfied the procedural requirement under Rule 5(8)(i). In the first employee's case, the absence of notice did not vitiate the action because advance warning had already been given, the employee remained absent after taking fresh foreign employment, and a further opportunity could not have changed the result. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171861