<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 610 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171860</link>
    <description>The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 was held to require the Port Trust to act under Section 62 for disposal of uncleared containerised cargo; the fact that the goods were inside containers did not prevent the statutory sale power from operating, and bye-laws could not override that mandate. The Court also held that Indo-Nepal transit arrangements did not bar action under Indian law. On demurrage, charges could be levied only up to the date the writ petition was filed, and earlier debits had to be recalculated with sale expenses paid first from sale proceeds, any balance adjusted against demurrage, and surplus kept deposited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 610 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171860</link>
      <description>The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 was held to require the Port Trust to act under Section 62 for disposal of uncleared containerised cargo; the fact that the goods were inside containers did not prevent the statutory sale power from operating, and bye-laws could not override that mandate. The Court also held that Indo-Nepal transit arrangements did not bar action under Indian law. On demurrage, charges could be levied only up to the date the writ petition was filed, and earlier debits had to be recalculated with sale expenses paid first from sale proceeds, any balance adjusted against demurrage, and surplus kept deposited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>