<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the block assessment order under section 158BD of the Income Tax Act was time-barred due to a delay in issuing the notice. The delay of more than three years in initiating proceedings after the completion of assessment in the searched person&#039;s case was deemed unreasonable. As a result, the order was quashed, emphasizing the importance of timely issuance of notices in block assessment proceedings to adhere to statutory provisions and avoid being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the block assessment order under section 158BD of the Income Tax Act was time-barred due to a delay in issuing the notice. The delay of more than three years in initiating proceedings after the completion of assessment in the searched person&#039;s case was deemed unreasonable. As a result, the order was quashed, emphasizing the importance of timely issuance of notices in block assessment proceedings to adhere to statutory provisions and avoid being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>