https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171857 The Tribunal directed the first appellant to pre-deposit &8377; 1.27 crores and the second appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the tax amount within specified timelines. Compliance is required on specific dates, with the balance amount of duty and penalty waived during the appeal pendency. The Tribunal found that the appellants' services were not akin to C & F Agents' services and that their case was not covered by the Larger Bench decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department's demand for pre-deposit. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 15:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171857 The Tribunal directed the first appellant to pre-deposit &8377; 1.27 crores and the second appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the tax amount within specified timelines. Compliance is required on specific dates, with the balance amount of duty and penalty waived during the appeal pendency. The Tribunal found that the appellants' services were not akin to C & F Agents' services and that their case was not covered by the Larger Bench decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department's demand for pre-deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171857