<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 171 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the case, upholding the disallowance of the gratuity premium deduction but allowing deductions for provisions for bad debts, leave encashment, and interest under the ASIDE scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of each issue, considering relevant case laws and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 171 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the case, upholding the disallowance of the gratuity premium deduction but allowing deductions for provisions for bad debts, leave encashment, and interest under the ASIDE scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of each issue, considering relevant case laws and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>