<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of interest capitalization on a shop purchase back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the deletions made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on other grounds, emphasizing the importance of positive evidence and adherence to proper accounting practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 06:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 167 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of interest capitalization on a shop purchase back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the deletions made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on other grounds, emphasizing the importance of positive evidence and adherence to proper accounting practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>