<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 162 - Cestat Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the adjudicating authorities to ensure no Service Tax liability for the sub-contractor if the main contractor had already paid taxes on the entire contract value, including the sub-contractor&#039;s portion. All issues were left open for further deliberation by the adjudicating authority, maintaining fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 162 - Cestat Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the adjudicating authorities to ensure no Service Tax liability for the sub-contractor if the main contractor had already paid taxes on the entire contract value, including the sub-contractor&#039;s portion. All issues were left open for further deliberation by the adjudicating authority, maintaining fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>