https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171831 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and partially sustained the demand for duty, while setting aside the duty demand on absolutely confiscated goods. It directed the finalization of assessments and recomputation of duty. The appeal by M/s. L.D. Textiles was partially allowed, while other appellants' appeals were rejected. A dissenting opinion argued the Collector of Customs, Gujarat, lacked jurisdiction, suggesting remittance to the appropriate authority, but the majority opinion prevailed. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171831 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and partially sustained the demand for duty, while setting aside the duty demand on absolutely confiscated goods. It directed the finalization of assessments and recomputation of duty. The appeal by M/s. L.D. Textiles was partially allowed, while other appellants' appeals were rejected. A dissenting opinion argued the Collector of Customs, Gujarat, lacked jurisdiction, suggesting remittance to the appropriate authority, but the majority opinion prevailed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171831