<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 781 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171823</link>
    <description>Repeated adjournments and absence of representation led the Madras HC to dismiss the civil miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution. The court noted that the matter had been adjourned about eight times and had twice been listed for dismissal, but the petitioner still did not appear. No substantive customs issue was decided, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 781 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171823</link>
      <description>Repeated adjournments and absence of representation led the Madras HC to dismiss the civil miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution. The court noted that the matter had been adjourned about eight times and had twice been listed for dismissal, but the petitioner still did not appear. No substantive customs issue was decided, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>