https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171817 A review under Section 17-A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 cannot be used to reopen the same order after the party has already invoked the superior forum, as that amounts to parallel proceedings and abuse of process; the belated review was therefore held not maintainable. Fresh proceedings alleging fraud, suppression of material facts and misidentification of the suit land also failed because the respondents produced no credible material showing title, allotment, society membership or any enforceable interest, and the earlier findings had already attained finality. The earlier orders rejecting the respondents' applications were restored. en-us Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171817 A review under Section 17-A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 cannot be used to reopen the same order after the party has already invoked the superior forum, as that amounts to parallel proceedings and abuse of process; the belated review was therefore held not maintainable. Fresh proceedings alleging fraud, suppression of material facts and misidentification of the suit land also failed because the respondents produced no credible material showing title, allotment, society membership or any enforceable interest, and the earlier findings had already attained finality. The earlier orders rejecting the respondents' applications were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171817