https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262237 A stay application in a service tax dispute on denial of 67% abatement for erection, commissioning or installation service was found to raise a prima facie issue covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Bhayana Builders. The demand had proceeded on the basis that free-supply materials were not included in the gross amount received, but the Tribunal noted that substantial service tax and interest had already been deposited. On that footing, the remaining pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262237 A stay application in a service tax dispute on denial of 67% abatement for erection, commissioning or installation service was found to raise a prima facie issue covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Bhayana Builders. The demand had proceeded on the basis that free-supply materials were not included in the gross amount received, but the Tribunal noted that substantial service tax and interest had already been deposited. On that footing, the remaining pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262237