<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 121 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that HUF can be considered a &#039;relative&#039; for exemption under section 56(2) and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 90,000 based on the firm&#039;s ledger entries, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 06:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 121 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that HUF can be considered a &#039;relative&#039; for exemption under section 56(2) and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 90,000 based on the firm&#039;s ledger entries, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>