<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal also disallowed the enhancement of assessed income for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation, as no disallowance under section 14A could be added in the absence of exempt income. The appeals were allowed, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance in both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal also disallowed the enhancement of assessed income for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation, as no disallowance under section 14A could be added in the absence of exempt income. The appeals were allowed, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance in both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>