https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171800 Refusal to exclude lands with existing structures from acquisition was found arbitrary and discriminatory where similarly situated nearby lands had been excluded without any material basis for the alleged A, B and C classification of structures or any shown rational nexus with planned development. The absence of a disclosed intelligible differentia justified the challenge to unequal treatment, and the decision was set aside for reconsideration. The appellants were also required to be heard before any fresh decision on their objections is taken. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171800 Refusal to exclude lands with existing structures from acquisition was found arbitrary and discriminatory where similarly situated nearby lands had been excluded without any material basis for the alleged A, B and C classification of structures or any shown rational nexus with planned development. The absence of a disclosed intelligible differentia justified the challenge to unequal treatment, and the decision was set aside for reconsideration. The appellants were also required to be heard before any fresh decision on their objections is taken. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171800