https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262188 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal. The delay of 130 days in filing the appeal was attributed to the negligence and inaction of the applicant's employee, leading to the misplacement of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for vigilance and seriousness in such matters, concluding that the delay could not be condoned due to the employee's negligence. This case highlights the importance of timely actions and the repercussions of negligence in seeking condonation of delays in filing appeals. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262188 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal. The delay of 130 days in filing the appeal was attributed to the negligence and inaction of the applicant's employee, leading to the misplacement of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for vigilance and seriousness in such matters, concluding that the delay could not be condoned due to the employee's negligence. This case highlights the importance of timely actions and the repercussions of negligence in seeking condonation of delays in filing appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262188