<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 80 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262163</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) that the assessee correctly deducted TDS at 1% as the transactions with M/s. Max Logistics (P) Ltd. were in the nature of a sub-contract. The ITAT dismissed the appeals of the Revenue, emphasizing the contractual relationship between the parties and the applicability of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:47:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 80 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262163</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) that the assessee correctly deducted TDS at 1% as the transactions with M/s. Max Logistics (P) Ltd. were in the nature of a sub-contract. The ITAT dismissed the appeals of the Revenue, emphasizing the contractual relationship between the parties and the applicability of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>