https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171794 Amending tenancy legislation applied to an existing pending tenancy where the tenancy had not yet expired and the landlord's right to recover possession had not yet accrued. The decisive date was the date of accrual of the right to eject, not the date of an earlier notice. Because Bombay Act XXXIII of 1952 came into force before that accrual date, its extended tenancy period and new termination conditions governed the landlord's right to end the tenancy. The earlier notice was therefore insufficient, and a fresh notice complying with the amended statutory requirements was necessary before ejectment could be sought. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:11:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171794 Amending tenancy legislation applied to an existing pending tenancy where the tenancy had not yet expired and the landlord's right to recover possession had not yet accrued. The decisive date was the date of accrual of the right to eject, not the date of an earlier notice. Because Bombay Act XXXIII of 1952 came into force before that accrual date, its extended tenancy period and new termination conditions governed the landlord's right to end the tenancy. The earlier notice was therefore insufficient, and a fresh notice complying with the amended statutory requirements was necessary before ejectment could be sought. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171794