https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262147 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal regarding the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to service tax paid post-proceedings initiation but not reflected as receivable in financial statements. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the tax was not collected from customers and was not shown as receivable, granting the refund claim based on established legal principles. The decision, pronounced on 1.5.2015, affirmed the appellant's eligibility for the refund claimed. en-us Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262147 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal regarding the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to service tax paid post-proceedings initiation but not reflected as receivable in financial statements. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the tax was not collected from customers and was not shown as receivable, granting the refund claim based on established legal principles. The decision, pronounced on 1.5.2015, affirmed the appellant's eligibility for the refund claimed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262147