<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262122</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissing the disallowance of excess salary paid to the Executive Director for the assessment year 2011-12. The ITAT also found no violation of Rule 46A in the submission of information during the appellate proceedings, as the salary details were part of the records available to the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 39 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262122</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissing the disallowance of excess salary paid to the Executive Director for the assessment year 2011-12. The ITAT also found no violation of Rule 46A in the submission of information during the appellate proceedings, as the salary details were part of the records available to the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>