<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171793</link>
    <description>A rectification application was held not maintainable where the Tribunal&#039;s final order had already been carried in civil appeal to the Supreme Court and the appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake or error in its order and treated that order as final and affirmed. On that basis, it rejected the request for rectification, holding that no further correction could be entertained once the underlying order had attained finality after Supreme Court dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 18:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171793</link>
      <description>A rectification application was held not maintainable where the Tribunal&#039;s final order had already been carried in civil appeal to the Supreme Court and the appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal found no apparent mistake or error in its order and treated that order as final and affirmed. On that basis, it rejected the request for rectification, holding that no further correction could be entertained once the underlying order had attained finality after Supreme Court dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>