<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 888 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171790</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that the adjudicating authority must confirm that the 191 shipping bills were not used to fulfill the export obligation under the EPCG licence number before deleting it. Only then can the amendment proceed. The civil miscellaneous appeal was disposed of without costs, and the related M.P. was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 888 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171790</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that the adjudicating authority must confirm that the 191 shipping bills were not used to fulfill the export obligation under the EPCG licence number before deleting it. Only then can the amendment proceed. The civil miscellaneous appeal was disposed of without costs, and the related M.P. was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>