https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171783 An industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act does not abate on the death of the concerned workman during pendency of the reference. The Supreme Court held that, in proceedings under Section 2-A, the right to pursue the claim can survive to the legal heirs or representatives because the Act's object of securing industrial peace supports continuation of claims for monetary and consequential relief, including relief capable of computation under Section 33-C(2). The Court limited the application of actio personalis moritur cum persona and rejected the contrary view drawn from Section 18(3). The legal heirs or representatives may therefore be substituted and continue the proceedings. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2015 15:05:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171783 An industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act does not abate on the death of the concerned workman during pendency of the reference. The Supreme Court held that, in proceedings under Section 2-A, the right to pursue the claim can survive to the legal heirs or representatives because the Act's object of securing industrial peace supports continuation of claims for monetary and consequential relief, including relief capable of computation under Section 33-C(2). The Court limited the application of actio personalis moritur cum persona and rejected the contrary view drawn from Section 18(3). The legal heirs or representatives may therefore be substituted and continue the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171783