https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262118 The appellant sought abatement of excess duty paid for June 2012 as their factory was closed for over 15 days. The rejection of the abatement claim was based on duty payment timing. The court held that duty need not be paid for the entire month before claiming abatement, and interest could suffice for delayed payment. Following precedents, the appellant was deemed entitled to abatement of duty as claimed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary relief. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2015 10:37:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262118 The appellant sought abatement of excess duty paid for June 2012 as their factory was closed for over 15 days. The rejection of the abatement claim was based on duty payment timing. The court held that duty need not be paid for the entire month before claiming abatement, and interest could suffice for delayed payment. Following precedents, the appellant was deemed entitled to abatement of duty as claimed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262118