https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262117 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, setting aside duty demands for the periods of March 2011 and July 2013. The duty demand of Rs. 32,25,805/- for March 2011 was deemed unsustainable, with the appellant only liable to pay interest on delayed payment. Regarding the duty liability for new packing machines installed in July 2013, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant that duty should be calculated pro-rata for the period from 24.07.2013 to 31.07.2013, not for the entire month, leading to the setting aside of the duty demand of Rs. 1,51,35,483/-. en-us Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262117 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, setting aside duty demands for the periods of March 2011 and July 2013. The duty demand of Rs. 32,25,805/- for March 2011 was deemed unsustainable, with the appellant only liable to pay interest on delayed payment. Regarding the duty liability for new packing machines installed in July 2013, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant that duty should be calculated pro-rata for the period from 24.07.2013 to 31.07.2013, not for the entire month, leading to the setting aside of the duty demand of Rs. 1,51,35,483/-. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262117