<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 29 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262112</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs/input services, finding that the Revenue failed to prove the provision of exempted services. The appellant was allowed to avail Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 33,55,544. However, the appellant was not entitled to claim Cenvat credit for security and maintenance services at the Managing Director&#039;s residence, amounting to Rs. 1,04,884. The tribunal also upheld the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit on vehicle chassis converted into water/toilet carts, totaling Rs. 4,70,490. No penalty was imposed, except for the security service credit, and the appellant was directed to pay the denied amount with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 29 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262112</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs/input services, finding that the Revenue failed to prove the provision of exempted services. The appellant was allowed to avail Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 33,55,544. However, the appellant was not entitled to claim Cenvat credit for security and maintenance services at the Managing Director&#039;s residence, amounting to Rs. 1,04,884. The tribunal also upheld the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit on vehicle chassis converted into water/toilet carts, totaling Rs. 4,70,490. No penalty was imposed, except for the security service credit, and the appellant was directed to pay the denied amount with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>