<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 28 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax with interest and penalty under Section 78, citing suppression of facts to evade tax payment. However, penalties under other sections were set aside, considering the overall circumstances of the case. The appeal was disposed of with the Service Tax demand, interest, and penalty under Section 78 being upheld, while other penalties were waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 28 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax with interest and penalty under Section 78, citing suppression of facts to evade tax payment. However, penalties under other sections were set aside, considering the overall circumstances of the case. The appeal was disposed of with the Service Tax demand, interest, and penalty under Section 78 being upheld, while other penalties were waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>