<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 27 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262110</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal and writ petitions, ruling that the sale of packing materials to exporters did not qualify for exemption under Section 5(3) of the CST Act. The court emphasized the necessity of maintaining the identity of goods for the exemption to apply, noting that in this case, the packing materials differed from the exported goods. Agreeing with the learned Single Judge, the court held that Section 5(3) did not support the appellant&#039;s exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 27 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262110</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal and writ petitions, ruling that the sale of packing materials to exporters did not qualify for exemption under Section 5(3) of the CST Act. The court emphasized the necessity of maintaining the identity of goods for the exemption to apply, noting that in this case, the packing materials differed from the exported goods. Agreeing with the learned Single Judge, the court held that Section 5(3) did not support the appellant&#039;s exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>