<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262101</link>
    <description>The appeal against the ITAT order dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals for Assessment Years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 on the disallowance of land development expenditure was dismissed. The court found that there was no substantial legal question and upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) and ITAT, noting the lack of proper verification by the assessing officer and deeming the concurrent decisions plausible with no perversity. The appeals were ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 08:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262101</link>
      <description>The appeal against the ITAT order dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals for Assessment Years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 on the disallowance of land development expenditure was dismissed. The court found that there was no substantial legal question and upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) and ITAT, noting the lack of proper verification by the assessing officer and deeming the concurrent decisions plausible with no perversity. The appeals were ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>