<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171779</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving non-compliance of Foreign Exchange Management Regulations by a Haj pilgrimage tour operator. The Tribunal reduced the fine and penalty, considering the procedural nature of the offense and the operator&#039;s genuine status. The High Court found no grounds to interfere, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s actions were in accordance with the Customs Act provisions. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s plea for enhancement of the fine and penalty, highlighting the discretionary powers under the Customs Act for penalty imposition. The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171779</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving non-compliance of Foreign Exchange Management Regulations by a Haj pilgrimage tour operator. The Tribunal reduced the fine and penalty, considering the procedural nature of the offense and the operator&#039;s genuine status. The High Court found no grounds to interfere, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s actions were in accordance with the Customs Act provisions. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s plea for enhancement of the fine and penalty, highlighting the discretionary powers under the Customs Act for penalty imposition. The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>