<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 638 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as it did not challenge the Commissioner&#039;s findings on production delays, losses, compliance with regulations, and lack of evidence for clandestine activities. The judgment emphasized accurate accounting practices in pharmaceutical manufacturing, compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and the requirement for concrete evidence in taxation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 638 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as it did not challenge the Commissioner&#039;s findings on production delays, losses, compliance with regulations, and lack of evidence for clandestine activities. The judgment emphasized accurate accounting practices in pharmaceutical manufacturing, compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and the requirement for concrete evidence in taxation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>