https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171774 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, interference is permissible where factual findings are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or based on irrelevant material, even though bona fide need is ordinarily a question of fact. In eviction disputes, the landlord's requirement must be genuine and honest, but the landlord is the best judge of that need. The text also notes that courts should consider whether the requirement can be met by partial eviction, so that the rights of both parties are balanced in a rent control matter. On the facts described, bona fide need was treated as established, while relief was moderated by limiting eviction to part of the premises. en-us Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171774 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, interference is permissible where factual findings are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or based on irrelevant material, even though bona fide need is ordinarily a question of fact. In eviction disputes, the landlord's requirement must be genuine and honest, but the landlord is the best judge of that need. The text also notes that courts should consider whether the requirement can be met by partial eviction, so that the rights of both parties are balanced in a rent control matter. On the facts described, bona fide need was treated as established, while relief was moderated by limiting eviction to part of the premises. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171774