<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 662 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171772</link>
    <description>Municipal resolutions temporarily closing slaughter houses during Paryushan were upheld as valid delegated legislation under the parent municipal statute, because the power to the days and hours of operation included a limited closure. The Court held that the measure did not infringe equality, trade rights, or the asserted constitutional interests, given its short duration, public purpose, and object of respecting religious sentiments and communal harmony. It further held that the restriction on meat traders was reasonable and proportionate under Article 19(6), since business remained open for the rest of the year and the closure was not excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 662 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171772</link>
      <description>Municipal resolutions temporarily closing slaughter houses during Paryushan were upheld as valid delegated legislation under the parent municipal statute, because the power to the days and hours of operation included a limited closure. The Court held that the measure did not infringe equality, trade rights, or the asserted constitutional interests, given its short duration, public purpose, and object of respecting religious sentiments and communal harmony. It further held that the restriction on meat traders was reasonable and proportionate under Article 19(6), since business remained open for the rest of the year and the closure was not excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>