<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 479 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171767</link>
    <description>Regulations 5(e) and (f) under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 required an institution seeking recognition to obtain a no objection certificate from the State Government or Union Territory. The Supreme Court treated this requirement as an aid to the Regional Committee&#039;s statutory assessment of financial resources, accommodation, staff, infrastructure, local demand and other conditions for proper functioning, rather than a transfer of the recognition power itself. Because the regulations supported the Act and channelled the State&#039;s role to relevant statutory considerations, the delegated legislation was upheld as valid and intra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 479 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171767</link>
      <description>Regulations 5(e) and (f) under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 required an institution seeking recognition to obtain a no objection certificate from the State Government or Union Territory. The Supreme Court treated this requirement as an aid to the Regional Committee&#039;s statutory assessment of financial resources, accommodation, staff, infrastructure, local demand and other conditions for proper functioning, rather than a transfer of the recognition power itself. Because the regulations supported the Act and channelled the State&#039;s role to relevant statutory considerations, the delegated legislation was upheld as valid and intra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>