https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171760 In second appeal, interference with a first appellate finding is confined to a specifically framed substantial question of law; a bare challenge to the nature of property was insufficient. The Will had to be read as a whole to ascertain the testator's intention from its language and surrounding circumstances. On that construction, the recitals showed a limited dedication for the benefit of the appellant and his widowed mother, supported by post-death conduct and possession. The property was therefore not joint family property, and title vested in the appellant and his mother. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171760 In second appeal, interference with a first appellate finding is confined to a specifically framed substantial question of law; a bare challenge to the nature of property was insufficient. The Will had to be read as a whole to ascertain the testator's intention from its language and surrounding circumstances. On that construction, the recitals showed a limited dedication for the benefit of the appellant and his widowed mother, supported by post-death conduct and possession. The property was therefore not joint family property, and title vested in the appellant and his mother. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171760