<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1043 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262082</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant regarding the non-imposition of penalties beyond the 25% penalty paid before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned based on the appellant&#039;s explanation, leading to the setting aside of unnecessary penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1043 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262082</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant regarding the non-imposition of penalties beyond the 25% penalty paid before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned based on the appellant&#039;s explanation, leading to the setting aside of unnecessary penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>