https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262078 The Tribunal directed a re-examination by the adjudicating authority in light of a CBEC circular regarding the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 2.85 crore. The Tribunal also directed a re-examination of the demands for service tax on break bulk fee and freight rebate in line with a previous decision. For demands related to airline commission, airline incentive, and CCX fee taxation, the Tribunal found the classification prima facie sustainable and directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit towards the confirmed service tax dues. Additionally, a fresh examination was ordered for inadmissible credit demands to determine the impact of procedural lapses on the substantive benefit to the appellant. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262078 The Tribunal directed a re-examination by the adjudicating authority in light of a CBEC circular regarding the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 2.85 crore. The Tribunal also directed a re-examination of the demands for service tax on break bulk fee and freight rebate in line with a previous decision. For demands related to airline commission, airline incentive, and CCX fee taxation, the Tribunal found the classification prima facie sustainable and directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit towards the confirmed service tax dues. Additionally, a fresh examination was ordered for inadmissible credit demands to determine the impact of procedural lapses on the substantive benefit to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262078