https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262071 Article 32 is limited to enforcement of fundamental rights and cannot be used to challenge administrative refusal of renewal of permission to run medical courses. The claimed entitlement to recognition or affiliation for educational institutions was not a fundamental right, and the right to practise a profession under Article 19(1)(g) remains subject to Article 19(6). As the grievance arose from inspection-based administrative decisions and did not disclose a directly enforceable fundamental right, the writ petitions were held not maintainable under Article 32 and had to be pursued before the appropriate forum. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:30:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262071 Article 32 is limited to enforcement of fundamental rights and cannot be used to challenge administrative refusal of renewal of permission to run medical courses. The claimed entitlement to recognition or affiliation for educational institutions was not a fundamental right, and the right to practise a profession under Article 19(1)(g) remains subject to Article 19(6). As the grievance arose from inspection-based administrative decisions and did not disclose a directly enforceable fundamental right, the writ petitions were held not maintainable under Article 32 and had to be pursued before the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262071