<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the FAA&#039;s decision that payments to NSICPL were for carriage of goods falling under Section 194C, not Section 194J. As a result, the assessee was not in default, leading to the deletion of additional tax and interest demands. The AO&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision announced on 17.6.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the FAA&#039;s decision that payments to NSICPL were for carriage of goods falling under Section 194C, not Section 194J. As a result, the assessee was not in default, leading to the deletion of additional tax and interest demands. The AO&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision announced on 17.6.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>