<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1213 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171755</link>
    <description>Investigation by a CBI officer was not vitiated where the statute allowed authorisation by the competent CBI authority and the record showed such authorisation, so the rank objection failed. The Special Judge had jurisdiction because a State notification appointed the concerned Sessions Judge as Special Judge for cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment, so the lack-of-notification challenge failed. At the pre-trial stage, the High Court could not quash proceedings by reappraising the sufficiency and credibility of prosecution material; the court must only see whether a prima facie case exists for trial. The criminal case was therefore directed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1213 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171755</link>
      <description>Investigation by a CBI officer was not vitiated where the statute allowed authorisation by the competent CBI authority and the record showed such authorisation, so the rank objection failed. The Special Judge had jurisdiction because a State notification appointed the concerned Sessions Judge as Special Judge for cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment, so the lack-of-notification challenge failed. At the pre-trial stage, the High Court could not quash proceedings by reappraising the sufficiency and credibility of prosecution material; the court must only see whether a prima facie case exists for trial. The criminal case was therefore directed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>