<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 375 - Andhra High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171750</link>
    <description>Section 12-AA of the Essential Commodities Act was construed as governing release after arrest and the Special Court&#039;s powers in relation to arrested persons, not as excluding pre-arrest relief. It does not expressly or impliedly bar the Sessions Court or the High Court from exercising anticipatory bail jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC, because the special enactment does not provide for anticipatory bail and the two provisions operate in different fields.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 375 - Andhra High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171750</link>
      <description>Section 12-AA of the Essential Commodities Act was construed as governing release after arrest and the Special Court&#039;s powers in relation to arrested persons, not as excluding pre-arrest relief. It does not expressly or impliedly bar the Sessions Court or the High Court from exercising anticipatory bail jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC, because the special enactment does not provide for anticipatory bail and the two provisions operate in different fields.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>