<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 310 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171740</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied its earlier ruling in Union of India v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. as controlling precedent on the common issue raised in the appeals. Finding that the prior decision directly governed the present disputes and that no distinguishing feature or fresh reason was shown, the Court held that there was no merit in the appeals. The Civil Appeals were dismissed without costs on the basis of the binding precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:12:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 310 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171740</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied its earlier ruling in Union of India v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. as controlling precedent on the common issue raised in the appeals. Finding that the prior decision directly governed the present disputes and that no distinguishing feature or fresh reason was shown, the Court held that there was no merit in the appeals. The Civil Appeals were dismissed without costs on the basis of the binding precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>