<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1055 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171732</link>
    <description>Review is a creature of statute and cannot be conferred by judicial direction; a recall or fresh reconsideration order passed without statutory authority is without jurisdiction and unsustainable. Withdrawal of a writ petition also causes interim protection and consequential orders passed during its pendency to fall away, since they cannot survive the disappearance of the main proceeding. A fresh administrative order cancelling hoarding approval, passed pursuant to an invalid direction, without hearing the affected parties and without reasons for reversing the earlier approval, was held vitiated for breach of natural justice and arbitrariness. The original contractual arrangement therefore remained operative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1055 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171732</link>
      <description>Review is a creature of statute and cannot be conferred by judicial direction; a recall or fresh reconsideration order passed without statutory authority is without jurisdiction and unsustainable. Withdrawal of a writ petition also causes interim protection and consequential orders passed during its pendency to fall away, since they cannot survive the disappearance of the main proceeding. A fresh administrative order cancelling hoarding approval, passed pursuant to an invalid direction, without hearing the affected parties and without reasons for reversing the earlier approval, was held vitiated for breach of natural justice and arbitrariness. The original contractual arrangement therefore remained operative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>