<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 901 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171731</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC noted that the questions raised in the appeal had already been answered in an earlier decision of the same Court. As that binding position governed the dispute, the appeal no longer survived for adjudication and the interim relief was vacated. The questions were therefore answered against the Revenue and the appeal was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 901 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171731</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC noted that the questions raised in the appeal had already been answered in an earlier decision of the same Court. As that binding position governed the dispute, the appeal no longer survived for adjudication and the interim relief was vacated. The questions were therefore answered against the Revenue and the appeal was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>