<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171727</link>
    <description>Section 113 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act was upheld because the Act as a whole supplied sufficient policy guidance for a discretionary exemption power and did not involve excessive delegation. The 62 exemption orders issued under that provision were quashed because they were mechanically drafted, gave no reasons, imposed no conditions, and disregarded the statutory purpose of planned development and public interest. Section 113-A was also upheld as a valid legislative regularisation scheme, since it itself prescribed the framework, conditions, fee mechanism, time limit, and appeal remedy, leaving no unguided executive discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171727</link>
      <description>Section 113 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act was upheld because the Act as a whole supplied sufficient policy guidance for a discretionary exemption power and did not involve excessive delegation. The 62 exemption orders issued under that provision were quashed because they were mechanically drafted, gave no reasons, imposed no conditions, and disregarded the statutory purpose of planned development and public interest. Section 113-A was also upheld as a valid legislative regularisation scheme, since it itself prescribed the framework, conditions, fee mechanism, time limit, and appeal remedy, leaving no unguided executive discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>