https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171725 The court held that the demand for recovery of excess CENVAT credit availed by the appellants was not sustainable. The lack of action against the original supplier for passing on excess credit and the expiration of the limitation period led to setting aside the recovery order. The appellants' appeal was allowed, with any necessary relief to be granted as per the law. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171725 The court held that the demand for recovery of excess CENVAT credit availed by the appellants was not sustainable. The lack of action against the original supplier for passing on excess credit and the expiration of the limitation period led to setting aside the recovery order. The appellants' appeal was allowed, with any necessary relief to be granted as per the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171725